The
Neodymium-Samarium Dating Method
By Paul
Nethercott
October
2012
How
reliable is radiometric dating? We are repeatedly told that it proves the Earth
to be billions of years old. If radiometric dating is reliable than it should
not contradict the evolutionary model. According to the Big Bang theory the age
of the Universe is 10 to 15 billion years.1 Standard evolutionist
publications give the age of
the universe as 13.75 Billion years. 2, 3
Standard
evolutionist geology views the Earth as being 4.5 billion years old. Here are
some quotes from popular text: “The age
of the Earth is 4.54
± 0.05 billion years.”
4 “The
Solar System, formed between 4.53 and 4.58 billion years ago.” 1 “The age of 4.54 billion years
found for the Solar System and Earth.” 1 “A
valid age for the Earth of 4.55 billion years.” 5, 6
If we run the
isotopic ratios give in standard geology magazines through the computer program
Isoplot 7 we find that
the Uranium/Thorium/Lead isotopic ratios in the rocks disagree radically with
the Rubidium/Strontium ages. The U/Th/Pb ratios give ages older than the
evolutionist age of the Earth, Solar System, Galaxy and Universe. How can Earth
rocks be dated as being older than the Big Bang?
If we use
isotopic formulas 8-11
given in standard geology text we can arrive at ages from the Rubidium/Strontium
and Neodymium/Samarium ratios. The formula for Rubidium/Strontium age is given
as:
[1]
Where t equals the age in
years. equals the
decay constant. (87Sr/86Sr) = the current isotopic ratio.
(87Sr/86Sr)0 = the initial isotopic ratio. (87Rb/86Sr) = the current
isotopic ratio. The same is true for the formula below.
[2]
Here are
examples of isotopic ratios taken from several articles in major geology
magazines which give absolutely absurd dates.
Rocks of the
Central Wyoming Province
These rock
samples were dated in 2005 by scientists from the University of Wyoming. 12
If we
run the Rubidium/Strontium and Neodymium/Samarium isotope
ratios 13 from the
article through Microsoft Excel we get the following
values:
1.
Ages Dating
Summary
Dating |
Age |
Age |
Age |
Age |
Age |
Summary |
87Rb/86Sr |
147Sm/144Nd |
207Pb/206Pb |
208Pb/232Th |
206Pb/238U |
Average |
2,863 |
2,869 |
5,123 |
17,899 |
11,906 |
Maximum |
2,952 |
2,954 |
5,294 |
38,746 |
18,985 |
Minimum |
2,630 |
2,631 |
4,662 |
6,650 |
7,294 |
Std
Deviation |
38 |
39 |
152 |
9,754 |
3,298 |
The Uranium/Lead
dates 14 are up to sixteen billion years older than the
Rubidium/Strontium and Neodymium/Samarium dates. The Thorium/Lead dates are up
to thirty six billion years older. The so called true age is just a
guess.
Correlated Nd,
Sr And Pb Isotope Variation
According to the
article 15
this specimen [Walvis Ridge,
Walvis Bay] was dated in 1982 by scientists from the Massachusetts
Institute of Technology, and the Department of Geochemistry, University of Cape
Town, South Africa. According to the article 16 the age of the sample
is 70 million years. If we
run the various isotope ratios 16
from the article through Microsoft Excel we get the following values
respectively:
2.
Age Dating
Summary
Summary |
Pb207/Pb206 |
147Sm/144Nd |
87Rb/86Sr |
Average |
5,033 |
70 |
64 |
Maximum |
5,061 |
70 |
93 |
Minimum |
5,004 |
69 |
0 |
Difference |
57 |
140 |
93 |
A Depleted
Mantle Source For Kimberlites
According to the
article 17
this specimen [kimberlites from
Zaire] was dated in
1984 by scientists from Belgium. According to the article 18 the age
of the samples is 70 million years. If we
run the various isotope ratios 19
from the article through Microsoft Excel we get the following values
respectively:
3.
Age Dating
Summary
Summary |
207Pb/206Pb
|
206Pb/238U |
87Rb/86Sr |
147Sm/144Nd |
Average |
4,977 |
4,810 |
86 |
72 |
Maximum |
5,017 |
10,870 |
146 |
80 |
Minimum |
4,909 |
1,391 |
50 |
63 |
Difference |
108 |
9,478 |
196 |
17 |
The 207Pb/206Pb
maximum age is 34 times older than the 87Rb/86Sr maximum age. The 206Pb/238U
maximum age is 74 times older than the 147Sm/144Nd maximum age. There is a 10.8
billion year difference between the oldest and youngest age
attained.
Sm-Nd Isotopic
Systematics
According to the
article 20
this specimen [Enderby Land, East
Antarctic] was dated in 1984 by scientists from the Australian National
University, Canberra, and the Bureau of Mineral Resources, Canberra. According
to the article 20 the age of the sample is 3,000 million years. If we
run the Rubidium/Strontium
isotope ratios 21 from
the article through Microsoft Excel we get the following values
respectively:
4.
Rubidium/Strontium
Age Dating Summary
Average |
-873 |
Maximum |
3,484 |
Minimum |
-25,121 |
Difference |
28,605 |
There is almost
a 30 billion year difference between the oldest and youngest
dates.
Strontium,
Neodymium And Lead Compositions
According to the
article 22
this specimen [Snake River Plain,
Idaho] was dated in 1985 by scientists from the Geology Department, Rice
University, Houston, Texas, the Earth Sciences Department, Open University,
England and the Geology Department, Ricks College, Idaho. According to the
article 22 the age of the sample is 3.4 billion years. If we
run the various isotope ratios 23
from the article through Microsoft Excel we get the following values
respectively:
5.
Age Dating
Summary
Summary |
Pb207/Pb206 |
Pb207/Pb206 |
87Rb/86Sr |
Average |
5,143 |
5,138 |
40,052 |
Maximum |
5,362 |
5,314 |
205,093 |
Minimum |
4,698 |
4,940 |
1,443 |
Difference |
664 |
374 |
203,650 |
The Lead isotope
ratios from two different tables give dates 200 billion years younger than the
Rubidium/Strontium
isotope ratios. The Average age of the Rubidium/Strontium
isotope ratios is 40 billion years. Below we can see some of the maximum
ages and how stupid they are.
6.
87Rb/86Sr, Maximum
Ages
Age |
Age |
Million
Years |
Million
Years |
205,093 |
11,974 |
189,521 |
11,908 |
188,777 |
9,960 |
95,450 |
9,101 |
52,643 |
7,124 |
13,119 |
6,022 |
12,220 |
5,089 |
Sr, Nd, and Os
Isotope Geochemistry
According to the
article 24
this specimen [Camp Creek area, Arizona] was dated in 1987 by
scientists from The
University of Tennessee, the University of Michigan, the University of
California, Leeds University, and the University of Chicago. According to the
article 25 the age of the samples is 120 million years. If we
run the various isotope ratios 26
from two different tables in the article through Microsoft Excel we
get the following values respectively:
7.
Rubidium/Strontium
and Sm/Nd Age Dating Summary
Summary |
87Rb/86Sr |
87Rb/86Sr |
147Sm/144Nd |
147Sm/144Nd |
Average |
310 |
103 |
120 |
159 |
Maximum |
1,092 |
207 |
123 |
400 |
Minimum |
0 |
0 |
120 |
119 |
Difference |
1,092 |
207 |
3 |
281 |
The author’s
choice of 120 million years is just a guess.
Pb, Nd and Sr
Isotopic Geochemistry
According to the
article 27
this specimen [Bellsbank kimberlite, South
Africa] was dated in 1991 by scientists from the University Of Rochester,
New York, Guiyang University in China, and the United States Geological Survey,
Colorado. According to the article 67 the age of the samples is just
1 million years. If we
run the various isotope ratios 68
from two different tables in the article through Microsoft Excel we
get the following values respectively:
8.
Age Dating
Summary
Table |
207Pb/206Pb |
206Pb/238U |
208Pb/232Th |
87Rb/86Sr |
Summaries |
Age |
Age |
Age |
Age |
Average |
5,057 |
5,092 |
10,182 |
-1,502 |
Maximum |
5,120 |
8,584 |
17,171 |
0 |
Minimum |
5,002 |
0 |
0 |
-3,593 |
Difference |
118 |
8,584 |
17,171 |
3,593 |
In tables 9 to
12 we can see some of the astounding spread of dates [million of years]. The
oldest date is over 17 billion years old. The youngest is less than negative 3.5
billion years. The difference between the two is over 20 billion years.
According to the article the true age of the rock is just one million years
old!
9.
208Pb/232Th,
Maximum Ages
Age |
Age |
Age |
Age |
17,171 |
13,322 |
9,737 |
7,968 |
15,343 |
13,202 |
9,707 |
7,830 |
15,299 |
13,001 |
9,049 |
7,250 |
15,136 |
11,119 |
8,420 |
6,972 |
15,054 |
10,873 |
8,419 |
6,628 |
13,476 |
10,758 |
8,368 |
6,577 |
10.
206Pb/238U,
Maximum Ages
Age |
Age |
Age |
8,584 |
6,656 |
5,576 |
7,975 |
6,654 |
5,520 |
7,314 |
6,518 |
5,285 |
7,184 |
6,448 |
5,159 |
6,861 |
5,758 |
5,099 |
11.
Pb 207/206,
Maximum Ages
Age |
Age |
Age |
Age |
5,120 |
5,067 |
5,060 |
5,049 |
5,109 |
5,066 |
5,059 |
5,045 |
5,097 |
5,066 |
5,051 |
5,044 |
5,077 |
5,065 |
5,050 |
5,044 |
5,067 |
5,062 |
5,050 |
5,033 |
5,067 |
5,060 |
5,050 |
5,022 |
12.
87Rb/86Sr, Minimum
Ages
Age |
Age |
Age |
Age |
-3,593 |
-2,981 |
-1,917 |
-1,323 |
-3,231 |
-2,725 |
-1,611 |
-1,245 |
-3,089 |
-2,050 |
-1,499 |
-1,229 |
-3,067 |
-1,926 |
-1,370 |
-1,194 |
Sr, Nd, and Pb
isotopes
According to the
article 30
this specimen [eastern
China] was dated in 1992 by scientists from the University Of Rochester,
New York, Guiyang University in China, and the United States Geological Survey,
Colorado. According to the article: “Observed high Th/U, Rb/Sr, 87Sr/86 Sr and
Delta 208, low Sm/Nd ratios, and a large negative Nd in phlogopite pyroxenite
with a depleted mantle model age of 2.9 Ga, support our contention that
metasomatized continental lower mantle lithosphere is the source for the EMI
component.” 30 If we
run the various isotope ratios 31
from two different tables in the article through Isoplot we get the
following values respectively:
13.
Age Dating
Summary
Dating |
232Th/208Pb |
206Pb/238U |
207Pb/206Pb |
Summaries |
Age |
Age |
Age |
Average |
14,198 |
7,366 |
5,014 |
Maximum |
94,396 |
22,201 |
5,077 |
Minimum |
79 |
1,117 |
4,945 |
Difference |
94,317 |
21,083 |
131 |
If the true age
is 2.9 billion years why so much discordance? In tables 14 and 15 we can see
some of the astounding spread of dates [million of years]. The oldest date is
over 94 billion years old. The youngest is 79 million years. The difference
between the two is over 94 billion years. The oldest date is 1,194 times older
than the youngest. According to the article the true age of the rock is 2.9
billion years old!
14.
208Pb/232Th,
Maximum Ages
Age |
Age |
Age |
Age |
94,396 |
39,267 |
10,595 |
8,171 |
90,683 |
26,266 |
10,284 |
7,789 |
74,639 |
18,334 |
9,328 |
7,638 |
58,153 |
16,357 |
8,821 |
7,375 |
55,324 |
14,250 |
8,771 |
7,317 |
45,242 |
11,215 |
8,403 |
5,759 |
15.
206Pb/238U,
Maximum Ages
Age |
Age |
Age |
Age |
22,201 |
9,878 |
7,348 |
5,746 |
21,813 |
9,656 |
7,335 |
5,700 |
19,320 |
9,054 |
7,249 |
5,218 |
16,656 |
8,242 |
7,202 |
5,201 |
16,200 |
8,044 |
7,019 |
5,163 |
14,748 |
7,996 |
6,923 |
5,159 |
13,607 |
7,590 |
6,848 |
5,099 |
11,256 |
7,422 |
6,292 |
4,812 |
An Extremely Low
U/Pb Source
According to the
article 32
this specimen
[lunar meteorite] was
dated in 1993 by scientists from the United States Geological Survey, Colorado, the United States
Geological Survey, California and The National Institute of Polar Research,
Tokyo. According
to the article: “The Pb-Pb internal isochron obtained for acid leached residues
of separated mineral fractions yields an age of 3940 ± 28 Ma, which is similar
to the U-Pb (3850 ± 150 Ma) and Th-Pb (3820 ± 290 Ma) internal isochron ages.
The Sm-Nd data for the mineral separates yield an internal isochron age of 3871
± 57 Ma and an initial 143Nd/I44Nd value of 0.50797 ± 10. The Rb-Sr data yield
an internal isochron age of 3840 ± 32 Ma.” 32 If
we run the various isotope ratios 33 from two different tables
in the article through Isoplot we get the following values
respectively:
16.
Rubidium/Strontium
Age Dating Summary
Average |
3,619 |
Maximum |
5,385 |
Minimum |
721 |
Difference |
4,664 |
17.
Uranium Age
Dating Summary
Table |
207Pb/206Pb |
206Pb/238U |
208Pb/232Th |
207Pb/235U |
Summaries |
Age |
Age |
Age |
Age |
Average |
4,673 |
8,035 |
10,148 |
4,546 |
Maximum |
5,018 |
56,923 |
65,286 |
8,128 |
Minimum |
3,961 |
1,477 |
2,542 |
2,784 |
Difference |
1,057 |
55,445 |
62,744 |
5,344 |
The article
claims that the Rubidium/Strontium age is 3.8 billion years for this meteorite.
If that is the true age why are all the Uranium/Thorium/Lead dates 76
so stupid? Or are they right and the Rubidium/Strontium is
wrong?
18.
208Pb/232Th,
Maximum Ages
Age |
Age |
Age |
Age |
65,286 |
14,430 |
9,094 |
5,401 |
33,898 |
14,410 |
6,520 |
5,396 |
25,013 |
13,107 |
6,166 |
5,365 |
22,178 |
12,738 |
6,121 |
5,098 |
21,204 |
11,641 |
5,671 |
5,035 |
17,611 |
11,174 |
5,408 |
4,678 |
19.
206Pb/238U,
Maximum Ages
Age |
Age |
Age |
Age |
56,923 |
10,895 |
6,764 |
5,777 |
27,313 |
10,278 |
6,670 |
5,625 |
17,873 |
9,653 |
6,449 |
5,602 |
13,680 |
8,009 |
6,436 |
5,278 |
13,623 |
7,395 |
6,070 |
5,147 |
The 72 Ma
Geochemical Evolution
According to the
article 34
this specimen [Madeira Archipelago] was dated in 2000 by scientists
from Germany. The average Lead date is 705 times older than the average Rubidium
date. The true age is claimed to be 430 million years old. 34
If we
run the various isotope ratios 35
from two different tables in the article through Isoplot we get the
following values respectively:
20.
Age Dating
Summary
Table |
207Pb/206Pb |
87Rb/86Sr |
147Sm/144Nd |
Summaries |
Age |
Age |
Age |
Average |
4,938 |
7 |
10 |
Maximum |
5,199 |
55 |
164 |
Minimum |
4,898 |
-4 |
0 |
Difference |
302 |
59 |
164 |
If the true age
is 430 million years than none of the dating methods are even vaguely close. The
oldest date is 731 times older than the youngest.
Temporal
Evolution of the Lithospheric Mantle
According to the
article 36 this specimen
from the Eastern North China Craton was dated in 2009 by scientists from China,
USA and Australia. Various tables 37 in the essay have either
calculated dates or ratios which can be calculated. As we can see below they are
all at strong disagreement with each other. There is a spread of dates over a 32
billion year range.
21.
Age Dating
Summary
Table |
147Sm/144Nd |
176Lu/176Hf |
187Re/188Os |
87Rb/86Sr |
Summaries |
Age |
Age |
Age |
Age |
Average |
291 |
-220 |
1,048 |
9 |
Maximum |
3,079 |
4,192 |
20,710 |
22 |
Minimum |
-3,742 |
-9,369 |
-11,060 |
0 |
Difference |
6,821 |
13,561 |
31,770 |
22 |
Geochemistry Of
The Jurassic Oceanic Crust
According to the
article 38 this specimen
from the Canary Islands was
dated in 1998 by scientists from Germany. According to the essay: "An Sm–Nd
isochron gives an age of 178 ± 17 Ma, which agrees with the age predicted from
paleomagnetic data." 38
The article places the age in the late Cretaceous period. Various tables 39 in the essay have
isotopic ratios which can be calculated. As we can see below they are all at
strong disagreement with each other. There is a spread of dates over a 350
billion year range! None of the Lead or Rubidium based dating methods even come
vaguely close to a Jurassic age.
22.
Age Dating
Summary
Dating |
87Rb/86Sr |
207Pb/206Pb |
Summary |
Age |
Age |
Average |
-149,488 |
4,974 |
Maximum |
51,967 |
5,024 |
Minimum |
-299,346 |
4,845 |
Difference |
351,313 |
179 |
Origin Of The
Indian Ocean-Type Isotopic Signature
According to the
article 40 this rock formation in the Philippine Sea plate was dated in
1998 by scientists from Department of
Geology, Florida International University in Miami. According to the
essay the true age is: “Spreading
centers in three basins, the West Philippine Basin (37-60 Ma), the Parece Vela
Basin (18-31 Ma), and the Shikoku Basin (17-25 Ma) are extinct, and one, the
Mariana Trough (0-6 Ma), is active (Figure 1)." 40 Numerous
table and charts affirm this as the true age. 41 Two tables 42
in the essay have isotopic ratios which can be calculated. As we can see
below they are all at radical disagreement with each other. There is a spread of
dates of over 13 billion years! None of the Uranium/Lead based dating methods
even come vaguely close to the so called true age. The oldest date is 706 times
older than the youngest date.
23.
Age Dating
Summary
Dating |
Age |
Age |
Age |
Age |
Age |
Summary |
87Rb/86Sr |
147Sm/144Nd |
207Pb/206Pb |
206Pb/238U |
208Pb/232Th |
Average |
42 |
41 |
4,960 |
4,260 |
8,373 |
Maximum |
55 |
54 |
4,989 |
7,093 |
13,430 |
Minimum |
19 |
20 |
4,921 |
1,904 |
3,065 |
Difference |
37 |
33 |
68 |
5,188 |
10,365 |
Sr, Nd, and Pb
isotopes in Proterozoic
Intrusives
According to the
article 43 this specimen
from the Grenville Front in Canadian Labrador
was dated in 1986 by scientists from Lunar and Planetary Institute,
Texas, the United States Geological Survey, and the Geological Survey of Canada.
According to the essay: "We report Sr, Nd, and Pb
isotopic compositions of mid-Proterozoic anorthosites and related rocks
(1.45-1.65 Ga) and of younger olivine diabase dikes (1.4 Ga) from two complexes
on either side of the Grenville Front in Labrador." 43 The article places the
age in the pre Cambrian period. Various tables 44 in the essay have
isotopic ratios which can be calculated. As we can see below they are all at
strong disagreement with each other. If the Uranium/Lead dating method is used
to test or calibrate the other methods then they are totally
wrong.
24.
Age Dating
Summary
Dating |
Age |
Age |
Summary |
87Rb/86Sr |
207Pb/206Pb |
Average |
1,437 |
5,135 |
Maximum |
1,503 |
5,218 |
Minimum |
1,395 |
4,931 |
Difference |
108 |
287 |
Age and Isotopic
Relationships
According
to the article 45 this rock formation in Antarctica was dated in 1992 by
scientists from California and
Germany. According to the essay the true age is: “Nevertheless,
concordant Ph-Pb model ages of pyroxene separates were obtained (20'):
4.55784 ± 52 Ga for LEW and 4.55780 ± 42 Ga for ADOR." 45 Several
tables 46 in the essay have isotopic ratios which can be calculated.
As we can see below they are all at disagreement with each other. The two on the far right show how
discordant the best dating evolutionist can offer.
25.
Age Dating
Summary
Dating |
Age |
Age |
Age |
Age |
Age |
Summary |
87Rb/86Sr |
207Pb/206Pb |
207Pb/206Pb |
147Sm/144Nd |
147Sm/144Nd |
Average |
4,556 |
4,707 |
5,007 |
4,452 |
902 |
Maximum |
4,610 |
5,002 |
5,110 |
4,497 |
1,428 |
Minimum |
4,518 |
4,558 |
4,960 |
4,397 |
536 |
Difference |
92 |
444 |
150 |
101 |
891 |
The Beni Bousera
Ultramafic Complex of Northern Morocco
According
to the article 47 this rock formation in Morocco
was
dated in 1995 by scientists from New
York. According to the essay the true age is: “The data are presented in
Table 5. Garnet-clinopyroxene two-point Sm-Nd isochrons from samples Ga and Ii
yield ages of 23.0 ± 7.3 m.y. and 20.1 ± 6.9 m.y." 48 Several tables
49 in the essay have isotopic ratios which can be calculated. As we
can see below the Rhenium/Osmium gives wildly
discordant dates.
26.
Rhenium/Osmium Age Dating
Summary
Average |
-272,455 |
Maximum |
-124,882 |
Minimum |
-361,842 |
Difference |
236,960 |
Implications for
Banda Arc Magma Genesis
According
to the article 50 this rock formation in the Banda Arc, East
Indonesia was dated in 1995 by
scientists from University of Utrecht,
the Royal Hol1oway University of London, the Free University of Amsterdam and
Comell University. According to the essay the true age is: “In summary,
the western part of New Guinea is characterised by Phanerozoic rocks (600 Ma) in
contrast to the northern part of Australia, which is dominated by Proterozoic
rocks (2200-1400 Ma)." 51 Several tables 52 in the essay
have isotopic ratios which can be calculated. As we can see below the Lead 207/206 dating method gives
wildly discordant dates. How can both methods be so at variance with each
other?
27.
Lead 207/206 Age Dating
Summary
Average |
4,971 |
Maximum |
4,991 |
Minimum |
4,933 |
Difference |
57 |
Pb, Sr, and Nd
Isotopic Features
According
to the article 53 this rock formation in China was dated in 2001 by scientists from
China. According to the essay
the true age is: “They define a
Rb-Sr isochron age of 286 Ma. Pb isotopic compositions for bitumen and crude oil
from Karamay, Liaohe, and Tarim all show features of crust–mantle mixing." 53 The
Neodymium/Samarium dating method gives the following dates: “Thus, the Nd
isotopic compositions strongly show an influence from depleted mantle (286 Ma).”
54A
Neodymium/Samarium Isochron
gives more dating information “143Nd/144Nd and 147Sm/144Nd ratios vary
within 0.51157 to 0.51197 and 0.0778 to 0.153, respectively, and yield old,
depleted mantle Nd model ages of 1.5 to 3.2 Ga.” 55 Several tables
56 in the essay [tables one to six] have isotopic ratios which can be
calculated. As we can see below the Lead 207/206 dating method gives
wildly discordant dates. How can both methods be so at variance with each
other?
28.
Lead 207/206 Age Dating
Summary
Table
1 |
207Pb/206Pb |
87Rb/86Sr |
Dating
Summary |
Age |
Age |
Average |
5,009 |
3,758 |
Maximum |
5,029 |
24,661 |
Minimum |
4,982 |
182 |
Difference |
47 |
24,479 |
29.
Lead 207/206 Age Dating
Summary
Table
2 |
207Pb/206Pb |
87Rb/86Sr |
Dating
Summary |
Age |
Age |
Average |
4,995 |
646 |
Maximum |
5,097 |
702 |
Minimum |
4,845 |
565 |
Difference |
252 |
138 |
30.
Lead 207/206 Age Dating
Summary
207Pb/206Pb |
Table
3 |
Table
4 |
Table
5 |
Table
6 |
Dating
Summary |
Age |
Age |
Age |
Age |
Average |
4,151 |
5,060 |
5,027 |
5,079 |
Maximum |
5,018 |
5,063 |
5,066 |
6,471 |
Minimum |
1,776 |
5,053 |
4,987 |
4,978 |
Difference |
3,242 |
9 |
79 |
1,493 |
Sources of
Labrador Sea Sediments
According
to the article 57 this rock formation in Labrador was
dated in 2002 by scientists from Canada. According to the essay the
true age is 8,600 years old: “The newly
acquired Pb isotopic data allow us to better constrain the different source
areas that supplied clay-size material during the last deglaciation, until 8.6
kyr (calendar ages)." 57
A table 58 in the essay has Carbon-14 dates alongside isotopic
ratios which can be calculated. As we can see below the Lead 207/206 dating method gives
wildly discordant dates. How can both methods be so at variance with each
other?
30.
Lead 207/206 Versus Carbon-14 Age Dating
Summary
Dating |
Carbon
14 Age |
Calibrated
Age |
207Pb/206Pb |
Carbon
14 Age |
Calibrated
Age |
Summary |
Years |
Years |
Million
Years |
Dating
Ratio |
Dating
Ratio |
Average |
11,656 |
13,114 |
4,967 |
456,448 |
408,945 |
Maximum |
22,190 |
26,064 |
4,982 |
636,961 |
584,938 |
Minimum |
7,792 |
8,485 |
4,944 |
223,722 |
190,469 |
Difference |
14,398 |
17,579 |
38 |
413,239 |
394,469 |
The Petrogenesis
of Martian Meteorites
According
to the article 59 these two meteorite samples was dated in 2002 by scientists from
the
University of New Mexico, the Johnson Space Center, Texas and the Lockheed
Engineering and Science Company, Texas. According to the essay the true age
based on Neodymium/Samarium dating is 173 and 166 million years old. 59 A table 60
in the essay has Rubidium/Strontium isotopic ratios which can be
calculated. As we can see below Rubidium/Strontium dating method gives wildly discordant
dates. The Table 1 summary is the rock that is supposed to be 173 million year
old. The Table 2 summary is the rock that is supposed to be 166 million year
old. How can both methods be so at variance with each
other?
31.
Rubidium/Strontium Age Dating
Summary
Dating |
87Rb/86Sr |
87Rb/86Sr |
Summary |
Table
1 |
Table
2 |
Average |
579 |
240 |
Maximum |
3,233 |
697 |
Minimum |
170 |
74 |
Difference |
3,063 |
624 |
Conclusion
Brent
Dalrymple states in his anti creationist book The Age of the Earth: “Several
events in the formation of the Solar System can be dated with considerable
precision.” 61
Looking
at some of the dating it is obvious that precision is much lacking. He then goes
on: “Biblical chronologies are historically important, but their credibility
began to erode in the eighteenth and nineteenth centuries when it became
apparent to some that it would be more profitable to seek a realistic age for
the Earth through observation of nature than through a literal interpretation of
parables.” 62
I
his book he gives a table 63 with radiometric dates of twenty
meteorites. If you run the figures through Microsoft Excel, you will find that
they are 98.7% in agreement. There is only a seven percent difference between
the ratio of the smallest and oldest dates. As we have seen in this essay, such
a perfect fit is attained by selecting data and ignoring other data. A careful
study of the latest research shows that such perfection is illusionary at best.
The Bible believer who accepts the creation account literally has no problem
with such unreliable dating methods. Much of the data in Dalrymple’s book is
selectively taken to suit and ignores data to the
contrary.
References
1
http://web.archive.org/web/20051223072700/http://pubs.usgs.gov/gip/geotime/age.html
The
age of 10 to 15 billion years for the age of the
Universe.
2
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Age_of_the_universe
3
http://arxiv.org/pdf/1001.4744v1.pdf
Microwave
Anisotropy Probe Observations, Page 39, By N. Jarosik
4
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Age_of_the_Earth
5
http://sp.lyellcollection.org/content/190/1/205
The age of the
Earth, G. Brent Dalrymple
Geological
Society, London, Special Publications, January 1, 2001, Volume 190, Pages
205-221
6
The age of the earth, Gérard Manhes
Earth and
Planetary Science Letters, Volume 47, Issue 3, May 1980, Pages
370–382
7
http://www.bgc.org/isoplot_etc/isoplot.html
8
Radioactive and Stable Isotope Geology, By H.G. Attendon, Chapman And
Hall Publishers, 1997. Page 73 [Rb/Sr], 195 [K/Ar], 295 [Re/OS], 305
[Nd/Nd].
9
Principles of Isotope Geology, Second Edition, By Gunter Faure, Published
By John Wiley And Sons, New York, 1986. Pages 120 [Rb/Sr], 205 [Nd/Sm], 252
[Lu/Hf], 266 [Re/OS], 269 [Os/OS].
10
Absolute Age Determination, Mebus A. Geyh, Springer-Verlag Publishers,
Berlin, 1990.
Pages 80
[Rb/Sr], 98 [Nd/Sm], 108 [Lu/Hf], 112 [Re/OS].
11
Radiogenic Isotope Geology, Second Edition, By Alan P. Dickin, Cambridge
University Press, 2005. Pages 43 [Rb/Sr], 70 [Nd/Sm], 205 [Re/OS], 208 [Pt/OS],
232 [Lu/Hf].
12
Rocks of the Central Wyoming Province, Canadian Journal Of Earth Science,
2006, Volume 43,
Pages
1419
13
Reference 27, Page 1436-1437
14
Reference 27, Page 1439
15
Correlated N D, Sr And Pb Isotope Variation, Earth and Planetary Science
Letters, Volume 59, 1982, Pages 327
16
Reference 45, Pages 330, 331
17
A Depleted Mantle Source For Kimberlites, Earth and Planetary Science
Letters, Volume 73, 1985,
Pages
269
18
Reference 47, Pages 270
19
Reference 47, Pages 271, 273
20
Sm-Nd Isotopic Systematics, Earth and Planetary Science Letters, Volume
71, 1984, Pages 46
21
Reference 50, Pages 49
22
Strontium, Neodymium And Lead Compositions, Earth and Planetary Science
Letters,
Volume
75, 1985, Pages 354-368
23
Reference 52, Pages 356, 363
24
Sr, Nd, and Os isotope geochemistry, Earth and Planetary Science Letters,
Volume 99, 1990, Pages 362
25
Reference 63, Pages 364
26
Reference 63, Pages 365, 368
27
Pb, Nd and Sr isotopic geochemistry, Earth and Planetary Science Letters,
Volume 105, 1991, Pages 149
28
Reference 66, Pages 154, 160
29
Reference 66, Pages 156, 157
30
Sr, Nd, and Pb isotopes, Earth and Planetary Science Letters, Volume 113,
1992, Pages 107
31
Reference 68, Pages 110
32
An extremely low U/Pb source, Geochimica et Cosmochimica Acta, 1993,
Volume 57,
Pages
4687-4702
33
Reference 75, Pages 4690, 4691
34
The 72 Ma Geochemical Evolution, Earth and Planetary Science Letters,
Volume 183, 2000, Pages 73
35
Reference 77, Pages 76-79
36
Temporal Evolution of the Lithospheric Mantle, Journal Of Petrology,
2009, Volume 50,
Number
10, Pages 1857
37
Reference 108, Pages 1873, 1874, 1877, 1879,
1880
38
Geochemistry of Jurassic Oceanic Crust, Journal Of Petrology, 1998,
Volume 39, Number 5,
Pages
859–880
39
Reference 115, Pages 867, 868
40
Origin of the Indian Ocean-type isotopic signature, Journal Of
Geophysical Research, 1998, Volume 103, Number B9, Pages 20,963
41
Reference 134, Pages 20965, 20969
42
Reference 134, Pages 20968, 20969
43
Sr, Nd, and Pb isotopes in Proterozoic Intrusives, Geochimica et
Cosmochimica Acta, 1986, Volume 50, Pages 2571-2585
44
Reference 43, Pages 2575, 2577
45
Age and Isotopic Relationships, Geochimica et Cosmochimica Acta, 1992,
Volume 56, Pages 1673-1694
46
Reference 43, Pages 1676, 1678, 1684, 1686,
1687
47
The Beni Bousera Ultramafic Complex of Northern Morocco, Geochimica et
Cosmochimica Acta, 1996, Volume 60, Number 8, Pages 1429
48
Reference 47, Pages 1434
49
Reference 47, Pages 1442
50
Implications for Banda Arc Magma Genesis, Geochimica et Cosmochimica
Acta, 1995, Volume 59, Number 12, Pages 2573-2598
51
Reference 50, Pages 2588
52
Reference 50, Pages 2580-2581
53
Pb, Sr, and Nd Isotopic Features, Geochimica et Cosmochimica Acta, 2001,
Volume 65, Number 15,
Pages
2555–2570
54
Reference 53, Pages 2559
55
Reference 53, Pages 2560
56
Reference 53, Pages 2558, 2561-2566
57
Sources of Labrador Sea Sediments, Geochimica et Cosmochimica Acta, 2002,
Volume 66, Number 14, Pages 2569
58
Reference 57, Pages 2572-2573
59
The Petrogenesis of Martian Meteorites, Geochimica et Cosmochimica Acta,
2002, Volume 66,
Number 11, Pages
2037–2053
60
Reference 59, Pages 2040-2041
61
The Age Of The Earth, By G. Brent Dalrymple, 1991, Stanford University
Press, Stanford, California, Page 10.
62
Reference 61, Page 23
63
Reference 61, Page 287